Super Bowl LX Betting Notes: Trends, Ratings, and Market Splits

Using historical Super Bowl results, situational systems, market split logic, and rating-style value notes

This is a trend-and-process write-up — not a “lock” sheet. The goal is to stack signals that have shown repeatable behavior in the Super Bowl (and in similar NFL situations), then translate those signals into a clean way to think about spread, moneyline, total, and teasers for Seattle vs New England (line range shown here: SEA -4.5 / NE +4.5 , total around 45.5 ).

ATSwins Angles

These are the key weekly systems and trend-based qualifiers for this matchup:

• NFL teams that won while scoring fewer than 12 points in that win have shown strong carryover results in the following game, going 22-13 SU and 23-11-1 ATS (67.6%) .
  System Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• NEW ENGLAND has been dominant when extending long win streaks, posting 38-7 SU and 33-12 ATS when riding a 3+ game outright winning streak since 2016.
  Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• In the last 10 Super Bowls , the team that allowed fewer points per game in the regular season is 9-1 SU and 8-2 ATS (80%) , including Philadelphia last year.
  Trend Match (PLAY): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• In the last 14 Super Bowls , the team with the better total offensive yardage edge in the regular season has not translated that into results, going 3-11 SU and 2-12 ATS (14.3%) .
  Trend Match (FADE): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
  
• Totals angle (45+ range):
  
  • Seattle is on a 33-17 Under run in games with totals of 45 or higher
    
  • New England is 30-20 Under in its last 50 games with totals of 45 or higher
    Trends Match (PLAY UNDER): SEA-NE (o/u at 45.5)
    
    

Super Bowl Trends and Systems

ATS and Money Line Trends

• Super Bowl favorites are 35-23 SU , but just 25-30-3 ATS (45.5%) over the last 58 (1982 was a pick’em).
  Trend Match (PLAY): SEATTLE ML (-230 vs NE)
  
• Over the last 24 years , underdogs have gone 18-6 ATS (75%) , including 14-4 ATS in the last 18.
  Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• The outright winner is 49-7-3 ATS (87.5%) in the 58 previous Super Bowls (best of any playoff round).
  
• AFC teams are 8-4 ATS in the last 12.
  Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• The better playoff seed is just 2-17-2 ATS (10.5%) in the last 28 Super Bowls (with several equal-seed matchups noted).
  Trend Match (FADE): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• In the last five #1 vs #2 seed Super Bowls, the #2 seeds hold a 5-1 SU and 4-2 ATS edge.
  Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
  

Over/Under Trends

• Super Bowl totals in the 43–47.5 range are on a 5-2 Over (71.4%) run, though the last two landed Under.
  Trend Match (SLIGHT PLAY UNDER): SEA-NE (o/u at 45.5)
  
• The 2025 Super Bowl was one of only 21 in history where both teams reached 20 points . Sixteen of those games went Over. Oddsmakers are projecting both teams in the 20s here (25–20.5) based on the spread/total combination.
  
  

6-Point Teaser Trends

• Across 59 Super Bowls:
  
  • Favorites: 38-20 (65.5%)
    
  • Underdogs: 40-17-1 (70.2%)
    
  • (1982 was pick’em, so no side counted)
    
    
• In the last 24 seasons , the split becomes much wider:
  
  • Favorites: 13-11 (54.2%)
    
  • Underdogs: 21-3 (87.5%)
    
  • A 6-point dog teaser puts New England at +10.5 , noted as attractive given the Patriots haven’t lost by more than a TD all season long.
    Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND TEASER +10.5
    
    
• By conference on 6-point teasers in Super Bowl history:
  
  • AFC: 38-20-1 (65.5%)
    
  • NFC: 42-17 (71.2%)
    
    

Regular Season Offensive Stat Trend Angles

• Higher points per game team: 8-14-1 ATS (36.4%) in the last 23 Super Bowls.
  Trend Match (FADE): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• Higher total offensive yardage team: 3-11 SU and 2-12 ATS (14.3%) in the last 14 Super Bowls.
  Trend Match (FADE): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• Lower offensive yards per point team (used as a fade indicator): 8-15 ATS (34.8%) in the last 23 Super Bowls.
  Trend Match (FADE): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• Better 3rd-down offense team: 8-16 ATS (33.3%) in the last 24 Super Bowls.
  Trend Match (FADE): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
  

Summary note: Recent Super Bowl history suggests that owning the stronger regular-season offensive profile hasn’t been a reliable advantage, which aligns with the strong ATS run for underdogs and teams with “lesser” resumes. This year, New England holds many of the offensive edges but is still the underdog.

Regular Season Defensive Stat Trend Angles

• Better points allowed per game team: 9-1 SU and 8-2 ATS (80%) in the last 10 Super Bowls, including Philadelphia last year.
  Trend Match (PLAY): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• Better total defense yardage team: 8-11 ATS (42.1%) since 2007, but 8-6 ATS (57.1%) since 2012.
  Teams with an edge in yards per play : 9-10 ATS (47.4%) since 2007, but 9-5 ATS (64.3%) in the last 14.
  Trend Match (SLIGHT PLAY): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• Defensive yards per point is framed as most relevant when used to fade the team with the edge , as that side is 7-13 ATS (35%) since 2006.
  Trend Match (FADE): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  
• Better 3rd-down defense team: 10-6 ATS (62.5%) in the last 16 Super Bowls.
  Trend Match (PLAY): SEATTLE (-4.5 vs NE)
  

Summary note: Recent Super Bowls have shown a growing lean toward meaningful defensive edges compared to offensive statistical edges. Most defensive markers for 2026 point toward the favored Seahawks.

Top Team Trend Notes

Favoring Seattle

• Seattle is 10-4-1 ATS in the last 15 games when riding a 6+ game winning streak
  
• Seattle is 7-2 ATS vs decent teams, outscoring opponents by 3.0+ PPG\
  
• New England is 4-9-2 ATS in the last 15 vs elite teams winning 80%+ of their games
  

Favoring New England

• New England is on a 7-0 ATS run in revenge spots (last year)
  
• New England is 11-4 ATS vs strong rushing defenses allowing < 3.9 YPR
  
• New England is 71-42-4 ATS vs strong defenses allowing < 18.5 PPG
  

Favoring Over

• Seattle is 12-3 Over in its last 15 playoff games
  
• New England is 12-3 Over in its last 15 vs decent passing teams averaging 6.8+ YPA
  

Favoring Under

• Seattle is 33-17 Under in games with totals 45+
  
• New England is 30-20 Under in its last 50 games with totals 45+
  
  

Team/Coach/QB Situational Trends

(109) SEATTLE (16-3) at (110) NEW ENGLAND (17-3)

• Seattle is 25-18-1 ATS (58.1%) vs non-conference opponents since 2015
  Trend Match (PLAY): SEATTLE (-4.5 at NE)
  
• New England situational split:
  
  • 38-7 SU and 33-12 ATS on 3+ game outright win streaks since 2016
    
  • 20-28-2 ATS (41.7%) as an underdog since 2021
    Trends Match: 1 PLAY, 1 FADE of NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
    
• Seattle is 22-10 Over vs teams with a better record since 2011
  Trend Match (PLAY OVER): SEA-NE (o/u at 45.5)
  
  

NFL Retread Coaching Systems

These systems apply to retread coach Mike Vrabel (New England) :

• In non-conference games , retread coaches have struggled: 46-64 ATS (41.8%) over the last decade, including 19-34 ATS (35.8%) over the last four seasons.
  System Match (FADE): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
• Since 2015, when coming off a win or tie , retread coaches are 90-82 ATS (52.3%) in their first seasons, including 40-29 ATS (58%) since mid-2022.
  System Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  
  

Extreme Stat Next-Game System

Crazy Low Scoring Games Command Attention

Teams that won despite scoring fewer than 12 points have followed that up by going 22-13 SU and 23-11-1 ATS (67.6%) in the next game.
System Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)

Strategies Using DraftKings Betting Splits Data

This section summarizes betting-splits systems and how they’ve performed, with qualifiers listed as of Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 2:30 p.m. ET (and noted that qualifiers can change before kickoff).

2024 DK bettor results recap:

• Majority handle on point spreads: 141-131 ATS (51.8%)
  
• Majority number of bets on point spreads: 140-130 ATS (51.9%)
  
• Majority handle on totals: 143-133 (51.8%)
  
• Majority number of bets on totals: 147-131 (52.9%)
  

With that context, these are the relevant systems and matches:

• System #1: When >68% of handle is on one side of an ATS wager over the past two seasons, that majority group is 71-81 ATS (46.7%) .
  System Match (FADE): SEATTLE
  
• System #4: In non-conference games (2023–2024), majority number of bets groups went 79-64 ATS (55.2%) .
  System Matches (SLIGHT PLAY ALL): SEATTLE
  
• System #8: When the majority number of bets backed the team with fewer season wins (2023–2024), that group went 46-38 ATS (54.8%) .
  System Match (SLIGHT PLAY): SEATTLE
  

Strength Ratings

These rating notes list the team/total, the current number, and the rating-versus-line difference:

• UNDERPRICED UNDERDOG per POWER RATINGS projection:
  Ratings Match: NEW ENGLAND +4.5 (+1.0)
  
• UNDERPRICED UNDERDOG per EFFECTIVE STRENGTH projection:
  Ratings Match: NEW ENGLAND +4.5 (+0.1)
  
• TOTAL PROJECTION FAVORING OVER per EFFECTIVE STRENGTH projection:
  Ratings Match: SEA-NE OVER 45.5 (+1.7)
  
• UNDERPRICED UNDERDOG per BETTORS RATINGS projection:
  Ratings Match: NEW ENGLAND +4.5 (+0.5)
  
• TOTAL PROJECTION FAVORING UNDER per BETTORS RATINGS projection:
  Ratings Match: SEA-NE UNDER 45.5 (-1.5)

Head-to-Head Series Trends

(109) SEATTLE vs (110) NEW ENGLAND

• The Over has hit in all seven meetings between Seattle and New England since 2004.
  Trend Match (PLAY OVER): SEA-NE (o/u at 45.5)
  
• In the last 10 meetings, underdogs are 5-5 SU and 7-2-1 ATS .
  Trend Match (PLAY): NEW ENGLAND (+4.5 vs SEA)
  

If you want to take these Super Bowl trends a step further, ATSwins.ai makes it easy to spot where the numbers and the market are (or aren’t) lining up. Instead of manually juggling trends, line movement, and matchup context, you can use ATSwins to quickly compare sides and totals, see where value may be showing up, and keep your process consistent all the way to kickoff. If you’re building a repeatable system for big games like the Super Bowl, ATSwins.ai helps you cut the noise and focus on the signals that actually matter.